HADDOCK server status for docking run /7220723881/apo_ensemble_rigid
Status: FINISHED
Your HADDOCK run has successfully completed. The complete run can be downloaded as a gzipped tar file here. The file containing your docking parameters is here.
Please cite the following paper in your work:
G.C.P van Zundert, J.P.G.L.M. Rodrigues, M. Trellet, C. Schmitz, P.L. Kastritis, E. Karaca, A.S.J. Melquiond, M. van Dijk, S.J. de Vries and A.M.J.J. Bonvin (2016). "The HADDOCK2.2 webserver: User-friendly integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes."
J. Mol. Biol., 428, 720-725 (2015).
How would you rate your experience with our portal? sentiment_very_dissatisfied sentiment_dissatisfied sentiment_neutral sentiment_satisfied sentiment_very_satisfied Thank you!done
Questions / feedback ? ask.bioexcel.eu
Please also consider giving us some feedback by filling the West-Life online user survey.
Summary
HADDOCK clustered 397 structures in 5 cluster(s), which represents 99.25 % of the water-refined models HADDOCK generated. Note that currently the maximum number of models considered for clustering is 200.
The statistics of the top 10 clusters are shown below. The top cluster is the most reliable according to HADDOCK. Its Z-score indicates how many standard deviations from the average this cluster is located in terms of score (the more negative the better).
A graphical representation of the results is also provided at the bottom of the page.
Cluster 2

HADDOCK score -32.4 +/- 2.0
Cluster size 113
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure 0.3 +/- 0.2
Van der Waals energy -16.4 +/- 3.0
Electrostatic energy -325.6 +/- 79.1
Desolvation energy 12.9 +/- 6.0
Restraints violation energy 37.7 +/- 3.54
Buried Surface Area 666.8 +/- 10.9
Z-Score -1.7

Nr 1 best structure Download structure
Nr 2 best structure Download structure
Nr 3 best structure Download structure
Nr 4 best structure Download structure
Cluster 3

HADDOCK score -26.2 +/- 1.2
Cluster size 68
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure 0.5 +/- 0.0
Van der Waals energy -20.0 +/- 2.2
Electrostatic energy -247.8 +/- 53.9
Desolvation energy 12.0 +/- 4.4
Restraints violation energy 66.0 +/- 1.90
Buried Surface Area 661.3 +/- 19.6
Z-Score -0.3

Nr 1 best structure Download structure
Nr 2 best structure Download structure
Nr 3 best structure Download structure
Nr 4 best structure Download structure
Cluster 1

HADDOCK score -24.9 +/- 0.9
Cluster size 163
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure 1.2 +/- 0.0
Van der Waals energy -17.9 +/- 1.7
Electrostatic energy -276.2 +/- 37.1
Desolvation energy 14.8 +/- 7.9
Restraints violation energy 58.5 +/- 22.94
Buried Surface Area 644.8 +/- 22.9
Z-Score 0.0

Nr 1 best structure Download structure
Nr 2 best structure Download structure
Nr 3 best structure Download structure
Nr 4 best structure Download structure
Cluster 4

HADDOCK score -22.5 +/- 0.8
Cluster size 45
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure 1.4 +/- 0.0
Van der Waals energy -19.0 +/- 2.5
Electrostatic energy -263.1 +/- 28.9
Desolvation energy 15.8 +/- 2.1
Restraints violation energy 70.3 +/- 1.82
Buried Surface Area 637.5 +/- 13.8
Z-Score 0.6

Nr 1 best structure Download structure
Nr 2 best structure Download structure
Nr 3 best structure Download structure
Nr 4 best structure Download structure
Cluster 5

HADDOCK score -19.1 +/- 4.1
Cluster size 8
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure 1.2 +/- 0.0
Van der Waals energy -22.0 +/- 2.1
Electrostatic energy -240.7 +/- 35.8
Desolvation energy 20.3 +/- 5.1
Restraints violation energy 67.3 +/- 3.79
Buried Surface Area 640.8 +/- 11.2
Z-Score 1.3

Nr 1 best structure Download structure
Nr 2 best structure Download structure
Nr 3 best structure Download structure
Nr 4 best structure Download structure
Results analysis
The results and graphics presented below are based on water-refined models generated by HADDOCK. The clusters (indicated in color in the graphs) are calculated based on the interface-ligand RMSDs calculated by HADDOCK, with the interface defined automatically based on all observed contacts. The various structural analysis (FCC, i-RMSD and l-RMSD) are made with respect to the best HADDOCK model (the one with the lowest HADDOCK score).

interface-ligand-RMSD against HADDOCK score for water refined structures
interface-RMSD against HADDOCK score for water refined structures ligand-RMSD against HADDOCK score for water refined structures
FCC* against HADDOCK score for water refined structures Van der Waals again i-RMSD for water refined structures
Electrostatic again i-RMSD for water refined structures AIRs again i-RMSD for water refined structures
Supplementary information:
i-RMSD -> interface-RMSD calculated on the backbone (CA,C,N,O,P) atoms of all residues involved in intermolecular contact using a 10Å cutoff
l-RMSD -> ligand-RMSD calculated on the backbone atoms (CA,C,N,O,P) of all (N>1) molecules after fitting on the backbone atoms of the first (N=1) molecule
FCC -> Fraction of common contacts. The intermolecular contacts are defined based on the best HADDOCK model using a 5Å cutoff (see Rodrigues et al, Proteins 2012)
a.u. -> Arbitrary Units
The cluster averages and standard deviations are indicated by colored dots with associated error bars. The average values are calculated on the best 4 structures of each clusters (based on the HADDOCK score).

Note that HADDOCK results are deleted after one week.