- HADDOCK server status for docking run PRE5-PUP2-MS-crosslinks
- Status: FINISHED
- Your HADDOCK run has successfully completed. The complete run can be downloaded as a gzipped tar file here. The file containing your docking parameters is here.
- Please cite the following paper in your work:
G.C.P van Zundert, J.P.G.L.M. Rodrigues, M. Trellet, C. Schmitz, P.L. Kastritis, E. Karaca, A.S.J. Melquiond, M. van Dijk, S.J. de Vries and (2016). "The HADDOCK2.2 webserver: User-friendly integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes."
J. Mol. Biol., 428, 720-725 (2015).- Questions / feedback ? ask.bioexcel.eu
- Summary
- HADDOCK clustered 189 structures in 8 cluster(s), which represents 94.5 % of the water-refined models HADDOCK generated. Note that currently the maximum number of models considered for clustering is 200.
- The statistics of the top 10 clusters are shown below. The top cluster is the most reliable according to HADDOCK. Its Z-score indicates how many standard deviations from the average this cluster is located in terms of score (the more negative the better).
- A graphical representation of the results is also provided at the bottom of the page.
- Please cite the following paper in your work:
- Cluster 1
HADDOCK score | -124.7 +/- 3.5 |
Cluster size | 110 |
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure | 0.9 +/- 0.1 |
Van der Waals energy | -62.6 +/- 3.8 |
Electrostatic energy | -258.1 +/- 26.8 |
Desolvation energy | -10.4 +/- 2.7 |
Restraints violation energy | 0.0 +/- 0.00 |
Buried Surface Area | 2213.6 +/- 73.2 |
Z-Score | -1.7 |
Nr 1 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 2 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 3 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 4 best structure | Download structure |
- Cluster 8
HADDOCK score | -117.0 +/- 15.2 |
Cluster size | 4 |
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure | 0.8 +/- 0.5 |
Van der Waals energy | -59.1 +/- 13.2 |
Electrostatic energy | -251.7 +/- 49.7 |
Desolvation energy | -7.5 +/- 7.2 |
Restraints violation energy | 0.0 +/- 0.00 |
Buried Surface Area | 2174.0 +/- 319.0 |
Z-Score | -1.4 |
Nr 1 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 2 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 3 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 4 best structure | Download structure |
- Cluster 3
HADDOCK score | -89.6 +/- 2.4 |
Cluster size | 16 |
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure | 1.2 +/- 0.1 |
Van der Waals energy | -43.6 +/- 2.3 |
Electrostatic energy | -169.3 +/- 7.5 |
Desolvation energy | -12.1 +/- 5.2 |
Restraints violation energy | 0.0 +/- 0.04 |
Buried Surface Area | 1660.9 +/- 47.6 |
Z-Score | -0.3 |
Nr 1 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 2 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 3 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 4 best structure | Download structure |
- Cluster 2
HADDOCK score | -83.3 +/- 5.5 |
Cluster size | 35 |
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure | 1.4 +/- 0.4 |
Van der Waals energy | -39.4 +/- 3.3 |
Electrostatic energy | -138.7 +/- 36.0 |
Desolvation energy | -16.2 +/- 12.6 |
Restraints violation energy | 0.1 +/- 0.08 |
Buried Surface Area | 1483.1 +/- 153.4 |
Z-Score | -0.1 |
Nr 1 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 2 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 3 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 4 best structure | Download structure |
- Cluster 5
HADDOCK score | -70.4 +/- 5.3 |
Cluster size | 6 |
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure | 1.5 +/- 0.1 |
Van der Waals energy | -44.3 +/- 7.6 |
Electrostatic energy | -102.9 +/- 23.4 |
Desolvation energy | -5.5 +/- 6.6 |
Restraints violation energy | 0.0 +/- 0.01 |
Buried Surface Area | 1575.8 +/- 130.1 |
Z-Score | 0.4 |
Nr 1 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 2 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 3 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 4 best structure | Download structure |
- Cluster 4
HADDOCK score | -65.1 +/- 7.0 |
Cluster size | 10 |
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure | 1.6 +/- 0.1 |
Van der Waals energy | -34.7 +/- 5.7 |
Electrostatic energy | -136.6 +/- 47.8 |
Desolvation energy | -3.1 +/- 7.7 |
Restraints violation energy | 0.5 +/- 0.39 |
Buried Surface Area | 1330.9 +/- 88.7 |
Z-Score | 0.6 |
Nr 1 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 2 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 3 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 4 best structure | Download structure |
- Cluster 7
HADDOCK score | -53.4 +/- 5.7 |
Cluster size | 4 |
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure | 1.9 +/- 0.3 |
Van der Waals energy | -23.2 +/- 3.5 |
Electrostatic energy | -158.3 +/- 29.3 |
Desolvation energy | 1.4 +/- 4.8 |
Restraints violation energy | 0.2 +/- 0.12 |
Buried Surface Area | 1323.3 +/- 152.0 |
Z-Score | 1.1 |
Nr 1 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 2 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 3 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 4 best structure | Download structure |
- Cluster 6
HADDOCK score | -50.7 +/- 12.7 |
Cluster size | 4 |
RMSD from the overall lowest-energy structure | 1.8 +/- 0.1 |
Van der Waals energy | -25.6 +/- 3.9 |
Electrostatic energy | -123.5 +/- 56.6 |
Desolvation energy | -0.5 +/- 7.2 |
Restraints violation energy | 0.4 +/- 0.34 |
Buried Surface Area | 1163.3 +/- 132.0 |
Z-Score | 1.2 |
Nr 1 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 2 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 3 best structure | Download structure |
Nr 4 best structure | Download structure |
- Results analysis
- The results and graphics presented below are based on water-refined models generated by HADDOCK. The clusters (indicated in color in the graphs) are calculated based on the interface-ligand RMSDs calculated by HADDOCK, with the interface defined automatically based on all observed contacts. The various structural analysis (FCC, i-RMSD and l-RMSD) are made with respect to the best HADDOCK model (the one with the lowest HADDOCK score).
- Supplementary information:
- i-RMSD -> interface-RMSD calculated on the backbone (CA,C,N,O,P) atoms of all residues involved in intermolecular contact using a 10Å cutoff
l-RMSD -> ligand-RMSD calculated on the backbone atoms (CA,C,N,O,P) of all (N>1) molecules after fitting on the backbone atoms of the first (N=1) molecule
FCC -> Fraction of common contacts. The intermolecular contacts are defined based on the best HADDOCK model using a 5Å cutoff (see Rodrigues et al, Proteins 2012)
a.u. -> Arbitrary Units
The cluster averages and standard deviations are indicated by colored dots with associated error bars. The average values are calculated on the best 4 structures of each clusters (based on the HADDOCK score).